Last Wednesday I marched with, and addressed, the 2000 or so students demonstrating at Glasgow University against the proposed cuts to the university. On that same day I lodged a motion in the Scottish Parliament against these proposed measures which would axe many undergraduate courses, including many modern European languages, nursing and anthropology.
The current range of language courses taught at Glasgow University are an essential part of the university’s educational mission, and it would be a serious act of vandalism to cut them, especially after just eight days of consultation. Frankly bizarre proposals are also on the table to cut social work, nursing, adult learning and anthropology. Scottish Ministers must act to protect these courses by properly funding higher education.
Here is a copy of the motion:
S3M-07943 Patrick Harvie (Glasgow) (Scottish Green Party): Proposed University of Glasgow Cuts— That the Parliament expresses deep concern regarding cost-cutting proposals at the University of Glasgow in a number of areas including a reduction in the number of modern languages available for study to two or at most three, which it understands would mean the cessation of the teaching of Russian, Polish, Czech, Portuguese, German and potentially Italian; considers that potentially affected staff and students were given alarmingly short notice of these proposals; also considers that the proposals do not take account of the importance of language learning in higher education for the health of Britain’s economy and future business prosperity that has been highlighted by a number of recent reports; believes that many universities feel forced to make cuts because of the political choices made by the Scottish and UK governments to cut higher education funding, and calls on the Scottish Government to protect higher education against this agenda of cuts and to work with the Principal of the University of Glasgow to prevent the destruction of entire courses in modern languages, nursing, anthropology, social work and adult education and to begin a new, meaningful consultation process with staff and students to seek mutually acceptable alternatives that would safeguard university education for the long term.





